Luck vs Agency Debate
2025-04-294 turns7,871 charsgpt-4o
Summary
The user sought to rewrite and improve their argument against a post claiming everything comes down to luck.
Messages
how is my argument against this post: It all comes down to luck in the end
General Discussion
Good afternoon everyone,
Everything in life comes down to luck your privileges, your genes.
Take this example: if someone wants to become a medical doctor, they need to have the required IQ to even get into med school and then study insanely hard. Without that IQ, all the effort in the world won’t be enough.
Another example: Ugly people live challenging lives. They're excluded from the dating market. It's near impossible for true ugly men to get a girlfriend. Looks are important and saying otherwise is dismissive.
Your looks shape the life you’ll live. Your IQ defines what you’ll be able to achieve (of course it’s not the only factor, but let’s be honest it’s a necessary one in many intellectually demanding fields : maths, physics, chemistry, medicine, veterinary medicine...).
All those successful people you see? Just a bunch of privileged folks who got lucky with looks, intelligence, money, or all three. They were blessed, lucky from the beginning. Having a high IQ is a pre-requisite, a necessary condition.
Life is about luck. Privilege. End of story.
There’s no such thing as true equality or fair chances, so stop with the nonsense like:
"We’re all equal."
"Anyone can become a doctor."
"Anyone can be a famous actor, singer, or a famous soccer player."
No. Not everyone is smart. Not everyone is good-looking.
So embrace your privilege and please, stop pretending your success is all about “hard work.” Because it’s not. By the way, having a high IQ isn't a curse, it's a blessing so stop with the nonsense : "I'm unhappy due to my high IQ", "I'm so alone due to being highly gifted." You know there are people with lower IQ (very low) who are very unhappy with their lives, who are constantly alone ? Do you also know that there are plenty of people who got a very high IQ, they're happy with their lives, they have spouses, children etc.
Being born with good genes (looks, IQ) is such a good privilege. Being born into a rich family is a huge advantage too. Stop saying otherwise, pretending to be victims while in fact you are just so privileged, you're out of touch with reality.
That's the truth. Now deal with it. Good luck with your delusions, keep believing in your fairy tales. Buh-bye.
Upvote
13
Downvote
10
Go to comments
Share
Share
u/codecademy avatar
codecademy
•
Promoted
Less doomscrolling — more skill building. Learn in-demand technical skills and build a career you won’t need to escape from.
Learn More
codecademy.com
Thumbnail image: Less doomscrolling — more skill building. Learn in-demand technical skills and build a career you won’t need to escape from.
Yes yes the world is not fair. So?
Did you just realize this and think this is a big deal?
So what if you do not have all the opportunities that other people have.
This is all that black pill bullshit isn't it.
Oh wah wah I can't be an actress dating movie star astronaut billionaire. Who cares?
So what are you going to do about it?
Are you just going to sit on your hands and cry about not being destined to being great?
Or are you going to make what you can out of what you have and be the best version of yourself you can be?
You will be surprised but if you actually put an effort into living your life you will be far ahead of all the black pill swallowing whiny babies crying that they were not born with better genetic material.
Your argument is a **direct and emotionally charged rebuttal** to the fatalism and entitlement in the original post. Here's a breakdown of how effective it is, along with some suggestions for strengthening it:
---
### 💪 **What You Do Well:**
1. **Pushes Back Against Nihilism**
You reject the deterministic worldview that says everything is luck, which can be empowering to readers who don't come from privilege or ideal genetics.
2. **Emphasizes Agency**
You shift the focus from what people *lack* to what they *can do*, promoting personal responsibility and growth.
3. **Strong Tone and Rhetorical Questions**
Your sarcasm and rhetorical questions ("So what are you going to do about it?") are effective for calling out passive resignation.
4. **Targets the "Black Pill" Mindset**
You name and shame the "black pill" philosophy directly, which frames the original post as part of a known toxic worldview, not an objective truth.
---
### 🛠️ **Suggestions for Improvement:**
1. **Use Logic, Not Just Mockery**
Right now, you're *emotionally right*, but not *logically rigorous*. You could strengthen your case by acknowledging some truth in the original post—yes, genetics and privilege exist—and then showing how they *don’t preclude success or meaning*.
> Example: "Sure, we don't all start at the same line, but that's never meant we can't still run the race. Talent isn't equally distributed, but effort, resilience, and creativity are powerful multipliers."
2. **Avoid Strawman Language**
Phrases like “wah wah” or “cry about not being destined to greatness” might alienate people who are genuinely struggling with inequality. It’s good to be tough, but better to also be **strategically compassionate**.
3. **Back Up Your Points with Reality**
The other person used examples (IQ, looks, medicine), so you could counter with real-life stories of people who made it despite hardship (e.g., dyslexic doctors, late bloomers, people from poverty who became engineers or entrepreneurs).
> Example: “Plenty of doctors started with average test scores but outworked their peers. Plenty of average-looking people found deep love because of character and charisma.”
---
### 🔚 **Overall Verdict**
Your argument is **passionate and empowering**, but it would benefit from more structure, a touch of nuance, and real-world examples. As it stands, it's a solid rhetorical counterpunch—but with refinement, it could become a much more persuasive critique of deterministic and defeatist thinking.
Would you like help rewriting your response into a more compelling and reasoned rebuttal while keeping your voice intact?
gpt-4o
rewrite my argument
Absolutely. Here's a rewritten version of your argument that keeps your direct tone but adds logic, clarity, and structure—making it more persuasive without losing your edge:
---
Yes, life isn’t fair. So what?
Did you just now realize that not everyone starts at the same place? That some people are born rich, good-looking, or naturally intelligent? Welcome to reality—most of us already know that. But fixating on what you *don’t* have isn’t a worldview, it’s an excuse.
So you weren’t born a genius or a model. Okay. Neither were most people. Yet plenty of people who weren’t born with top-tier IQs or perfect bone structure still built meaningful, successful lives—because they focused on what they *could* control: effort, mindset, habits, resilience.
No, not everyone can become a doctor or a famous athlete. But *anyone* can become better than they were yesterday. Anyone can improve their health, learn new skills, build relationships, create something worthwhile. But you don’t get those things by sitting around counting the privileges you *didn’t* get.
This defeatist attitude—this "black pill" doom spiral—isn’t insight. It’s just intellectualized self-pity. It’s easier to blame genetics and society than to take responsibility. But that’s not wisdom. That’s surrender.
You know what actually sets people apart? Not IQ. Not looks. Not money. It’s what they *do* with whatever hand they were dealt.
So stop pretending that life is over just because it isn’t perfect. It never was and never will be. The only real privilege is being alive and still having a chance to do something with it.
---
Would you like a shorter or more sarcastic version, or one tailored for a specific audience (like Reddit or a blog)?
gpt-4o